Advertisement
Streaming

Are Facebook posts more memorable than faces?

Researchers at the University of California, San Diego, have determined that Facebook statuses are more memorable than human faces. Really? Let’s test this theory.

Photo of Cooper Fleishman

Cooper Fleishman

Article Lead Image

Researchers at the University of California, San Diego, have determined that Facebook statuses are more memorable than human faces. 

Featured Video

Read that again. A team, led by visiting scholar Laura Mickes, found that social-network keyboard mashings stick in our minds more than the unique features on the front of our heads, the infinitely expressive collection of organs through which we communicate, physically and verbally.

In the study, people were two and a half times more likely to remember incoherent Obama rants, “KONY 2012” shares, and boastful wordvomit (an actual status from the experiment: “My math professor told me that I was one of his brightest students”) than a human face.

Could that actually be true?

Advertisement

I don’t think it is. I think the experiment was rigged. Or maybe the subjects were face-blind.

Let me try to prove it.

Is this status … 

Advertisement

… more memorable than Tyra Banks? 

Or Jennifer Lawrence?

Advertisement

Or Peter Dinklage?

Or Nicolas Cage?

Advertisement

Or how about Kristen Wiig?

Try really hard not to remember Marion Cotillard’s face.

Advertisement

Or Emma Stone’s.

Or Eddie Murphy’s. You see what I mean?

Advertisement

Look at Gary Busey.

Just look at him.

Advertisement

Ad infinitum.

Or Jim Carrey.

Advertisement

Right?

OK, I know what you’re thinking. These people are celebrities. We know their faces better than we know our own.

So here’s a regular example: Daily Dot Internet rights reporter Kevin Collier, a regular schmo.

Advertisement

Look at him. He’s holding a lamb. 

He’s way more memorable than this

And this:

Advertisement

And this:

And this

Advertisement

And this

And this

Advertisement

I rest my case. 

 
The Daily Dot